Ecology and Society Ecology and Society
E&S Home > Vol. 22, Iss. 3 > Art. 12 > Abstract Open Access Publishing 
Environmental justice research shows the importance of social feedbacks in ecosystem service trade-offs

Neil M. Dawson, School of International Development, University of East Anglia
Kenneth Grogan, Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen
Adrian Martin, School of International Development, University of East Anglia
Ole Mertz, Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen
Maya Pasgaard, Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen
Laura Vang Rasmussen, Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-09481-220312

Full Text: HTML   
Download Citation


Abstract

In this article, we shine a spotlight on approaches to research ecosystem service trade-offs and critically assess their representation of relevant social dynamics. Although studies linking ecosystem services and human well-being have provided theoretical insights into social and ecological trade-offs, we argue that ecosystem services research has paid insufficient attention to “social feedbacks,” people’s cognitive and behavioral responses to change. We demonstrate that augmenting ecosystem services research with environmental justice approaches (exploring perceptions of the distribution of costs and benefits, decision making procedures, and recognition of different values and identities) can more effectively capture important responses to ecosystem governance. Spatial analysis of land use change, mixed-method assessment of multidimensional well-being, and qualitative environmental justice research were applied in three villages adjacent to Nam Et-Phou Louey National Protected Area in northern Laos. Spatial analysis showed that, from 2006 to 2015, forest clearance for cultivation remained stable within the protected area. Well-being assessment revealed the local population benefited from rapidly increasing incomes, asset ownership, and reduced poverty during that time. In combination, spatial and well-being analyses paint a picture of limited trade-offs, despite growing incentives to exploit protected land and resources through cash crops and high-value forest products. In contrast, results from environmental justice research revealed profound trade-offs between conservation and local practices, and highlight governance deficiencies relating to procedure and recognition. Consequently, formal protected area rules were perceived to be illegitimate by many and actively undermined, for example through negotiated access with alternative authorities. We conclude that although well-being research provides an essential foundation to understand diverse attachments to natural resources, the addition of environmental justice research can reveal local perceptions and social feedbacks critical to ecosystem service trade-offs, and highlight pathways to reconcile them through satisfying stakeholders’ diverse, dynamic objectives.

Key words

conservation and development; conservation impact; equity; governance; Lao PDR; mixed methods; Nam Et-Phou Louey; protected area; rights-based conservation; social assessment; well-being

Copyright © 2017 by the author(s). Published here under license by The Resilience Alliance. This article  is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.  You may share and adapt the work for noncommercial purposes provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license.

Top
Ecology and Society. ISSN: 1708-3087