Ecology and Society Ecology and Society
E&S Home > Vol. 22, Iss. 3 > Art. 16 > Abstract Open Access Publishing 
Increasing the effectiveness of participatory scenario development through codesign

Marissa F. McBride, Harvard Forest, Harvard University, Petersham, Massachusetts
Kathleen F. Lambert, Harvard Forest, Harvard University and Science Policy Exchange, Petersham, Massachusetts
Emily S. Huff, Michigan State University, Department of Forestry, East Lansing, Michigan
Kathleen A. Theoharides, Climate and Global Warming Solutions, Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs, Boston, Massachusetts
Patrick Field, Consensus Building Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Jonathan R Thompson, Harvard Forest, Harvard University, Petersham, Massachusetts

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-09386-220316

Full Text: HTML   
Download Citation


Abstract

Developing scenarios to explore possible environmental futures is a widely used tool in social-ecological research. Scenario planners working in environmental systems increasingly enlist stakeholders to help develop scenarios, but effectively integrating stakeholder participation with scenario analyses and modeling remains a challenge. Using the New England Landscape Futures project as a case study, we explore how a method for codesigning a scenario elicitation process can be used to help balance the needs of both stakeholders and scientists. To illustrate the design process, we document eight influential decisions made with stakeholder input, describe the competing demands that we negotiated, and outline the rationale for the selected approach. We find that three priorities drove most of our decisions: maximizing stakeholder involvement in the scenario development process, efficient use of stakeholder time, and research needs. The outcome was a robust, intense, and highly structured one-day scenario development protocol that engaged stakeholders in the full scenario development process from initial orientation and identification of driving forces through to fleshed-out scenarios narratives and quantitative inputs able to inform land-use simulations. Its deployment in six state-specific workshops was successful in eliciting divergent scenarios that stakeholders perceived as being plausible and relevant. Stakeholder responses to the process were positive, though also reflected the compromises made during the codesign process. Research needs were largely met, though initial expectations likely exceeded what could reasonably be elicited from a stakeholder group in one day. Our experiences highlight the importance of process design and how selection of scenario development techniques should follow from the project objectives, problem context, and stakeholder preferences for engagement activities. The use of a codesign framework that recognizes the challenges involved and engages stakeholders in the design process can act as a shared learning experience and contribute to greater effectiveness and impact for participatory social-ecological scenario processes.

Key words

boundary spanning; land-use change; participatory research; scenarios; stakeholder engagement; transdisciplinary

Copyright © 2017 by the author(s). Published here under license by The Resilience Alliance. This article  is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.  You may share and adapt the work for noncommercial purposes provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license.

Top
Ecology and Society. ISSN: 1708-3087