Ecology and Society Ecology and Society
E&S Home > Vol. 21, Iss. 1 > Art. 31 > Abstract Open Access Publishing 
Operationalizing ecosystem-based adaptation: harnessing ecosystem services to buffer communities against climate change

Christine Wamsler, Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies (LUCSUS); Centre for Societal Resilience
Lisa Niven, Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies (LUCSUS)
Thomas H. Beery, Kristianstad University
Torleif Bramryd, Environmental Strategy, Lund University Campus Helsingborg
Nils Ekelund, Malmö University
K. Ingemar Jönsson, School of Education and Environment, Kristianstad University
Adelina Osmani, Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies (LUCSUS)
Thomas Palo, Department of Wildlife, Fish and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU)
Sanna Stålhammar, Lund University Centre for Sustainability Studies (LUCSUS)

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-08266-210131

Full Text: HTML   
Download Citation


Abstract

Ecosystem-based approaches for climate change adaptation are promoted at international, national, and local levels by both scholars and practitioners. However, local planning practices that support these approaches are scattered, and measures are neither systematically implemented nor comprehensively reviewed. Against this background, this paper advances the operationalization of ecosystem-based adaptation by improving our knowledge of how ecosystem-based approaches can be considered in local planning (operational governance level). We review current research on ecosystem services in urban areas and examine four Swedish coastal municipalities to identify the key characteristics of both implemented and planned measures that support ecosystem-based adaptation. The results show that many of the measures that have been implemented focus on biodiversity rather than climate change adaptation, which is an important factor in only around half of all measures. Furthermore, existing measures are limited in their focus regarding the ecological structures and the ecosystem services they support, and the hazards and risk factors they address. We conclude that a more comprehensive approach to sustainable ecosystem-based adaptation planning and its systematic mainstreaming is required. Our framework for the analysis of ecosystem-based adaptation measures proved to be useful in identifying how ecosystem-related matters are addressed in current practice and strategic planning, and in providing knowledge on how ecosystem-based adaptation can further be considered in urban planning practice. Such a systematic analysis framework can reveal the ecological structures, related ecosystem services, and risk-reducing approaches that are missing and why. This informs the discussion about why specific measures are not considered and provides pathways for alternate measures/designs, related operations, and policy processes at different scales that can foster sustainable adaptation and transformation in municipal governance and planning.

Key words

climate change adaptation; ecosystem management; ecosystem services; green infrastructure; municipal planning; nature-based solutions; renaturing cities; risk reduction; spatial planning; sustainability transitions; urban planning; urban resilience; urban transformation

Copyright © 2016 by the author(s). Published here under license by The Resilience Alliance. This article  is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.  You may share and adapt the work for noncommercial purposes provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license.

Top
Ecology and Society. ISSN: 1708-3087