Ecology and Society Ecology and Society
E&S Home > Vol. 20, Iss. 2 > Art. 27 > Abstract Open Access Publishing 
Measuring resilience is not enough; we must apply the research. Researchers and practitioners need a common language to make this happen.

Douglas M Glandon

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07576-200227

Full Text: HTML   
Download Citation


Abstract

This article is contributed by a practitioner in the area of country-level health systems strengthening who also has a background in resilience research. The intent of the article is to offer constructive reflection on the disconnect between the insights of resilience research and the application of those insights through development assistance. The primary reason for the existence of this communication block is that resilience research findings are not often translated in a format that is useful to those implementing resilience promotion projects. As a result, implementers do not usually review relevant research to guide their interventions. Resilience researchers and practitioners need a common language, one that arises from effective community engagement.

Key words

community resilience; development assistance; research to action

Copyright © 2015 by the author(s). Published here under license by The Resilience Alliance. This article  is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.  You may share and adapt the work for noncommercial purposes provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license.

Top
Ecology and Society. ISSN: 1708-3087