Ecology and Society Ecology and Society
E&S Home > Vol. 20, Iss. 1 > Art. 49 > Abstract Open Access Publishing 
Challenges of achieving Good Environmental Status in the Northeast Atlantic

Karen A Alexander, Scottish Association for Marine Science
Peter Kershaw, Centre for Environment, Fisheries & Aquaculture Science
Philip Cooper, School of Management, University of Bath
Alison J. Gilbert, Institute for Environmental Studies, VU University of Amsterdam
Jason M. Hall-Spencer, School of Marine Science and Engineering, University of Plymouth
Johanna J. Heymans, Scottish Association for Marine Science
Andreas Kannen, Institute for Coastal Research, Helmholz-Zentrum Geesthacht
Hans J. Los, Deltares
Tim O'Higgins, Scottish Association for Marine Science
Cathal O'Mahony, Coastal & Marine Research Centre, University College Cork
Paul Tett, Scottish Association for Marine Science
Tineke A. Troost, Deltares
Justus van Beusekom, Institute for Hydrobiology and Fisheries Science, University of Hamburg

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-07394-200149

Full Text: HTML   
Download Citation


Abstract

The sustainable exploitation of marine ecosystem services is dependent on achieving and maintaining an adequate ecosystem state to prevent undue deterioration. Within the European Union, the Marine Strategy Framework Directive (MSFD) requires member states to achieve Good Environmental Status (GEnS), specified in terms of 11 descriptors. We analyzed the complexity of social-ecological factors to identify common critical issues that are likely to influence the achievement of GEnS in the Northeast Atlantic (NEA) more broadly, using three case studies. A conceptual model developed using a soft systems approach highlights the complexity of social and ecological phenomena that influence, and are likely to continue to influence, the state of ecosystems in the NEA. The development of the conceptual model raised four issues that complicate the implementation of the MSFD, the majority of which arose in the Pressures and State sections of the model: variability in the system, cumulative effects, ecosystem resilience, and conflicting policy targets. The achievement of GEnS targets for the marine environment requires the recognition and negotiation of trade-offs across a broad policy landscape involving a wide variety of stakeholders in the public and private sectors. Furthermore, potential cumulative effects may introduce uncertainty, particularly in selecting appropriate management measures. There also are endogenous pressures that society cannot control. This uncertainty is even more obvious when variability within the system, e.g., climate change, is accounted for. Also, questions related to the resilience of the affected ecosystem to specific pressures must be raised, despite a lack of current knowledge. Achieving good management and reaching GEnS require multidisciplinary assessments. The soft systems approach provides one mechanism for bringing multidisciplinary information together to look at the problems in a different light.

Key words

ecosystem-based management; Good Environmental Status; Northeast Atlantic; soft systems methodology; trade-offs

Copyright © 2015 by the author(s). Published here under license by The Resilience Alliance. This article  is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.  You may share and adapt the work for noncommercial purposes provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license.

Top
Ecology and Society. ISSN: 1708-3087