Ecology and Society Ecology and Society
E&S Home > Vol. 19, Iss. 2 > Art. 37 > Abstract Open Access Publishing 
Should sustainability and resilience be combined or remain distinct pursuits?

Charles L Redman, Arizona State University, USA

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-06390-190237

Full Text: HTML   
Download Citation


Abstract

It has become common for sustainability science and resilience theory to be considered as complementary approaches. Occasionally the terms have been used interchangeably. Although these two approaches share some working principles and objectives, they also are based on some distinct assumptions about the operation of systems and how we can best guide these systems into the future. Each approach would benefit from some scholars keeping sustainability science and resilience theory separate and focusing on further developing their distinctiveness and other scholars continuing to explore them in combination. Three areas of research in which following different procedures might be beneficial are whether to prioritize outcomes or system dynamics, how best to take advantage of community input, and increasing the use of knowledge of the past as a laboratory for potential innovations.

Key words

adaptation; adaptive capacity; resilience theory; sustainability science; transformation

Copyright © 2014 by the author(s). Published here under license by The Resilience Alliance. This article  is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.  You may share and adapt the work for noncommercial purposes provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license.

Top
Ecology and Society. ISSN: 1708-3087