Empowering Local People through Community-based Resource Monitoring: a Comparison of Brazil and Namibia
Pedro de Araujo Lima Constantino, University of Florida; Comissão Pró-Índio do Acre
Henrique Santiago Alberto Carlos, Centro Estadual de Unidades de Conservação do Amazônas, Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Sustentável do Amazonas
Emiliano Esterci Ramalho, Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá; University of Florida
Luke Rostant, University of the West Indies
Carlos Eduardo Marinelli, Instituto Socioambiental
Davi Teles, Centro Estadual de Unidades de Conservação do Amazônas, Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Sustentável do Amazonas
Sinomar Fonseca Fonseca-Junior, Centro Estadual de Unidades de Conservação do Amazônas, Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Sustentável do Amazonas
Rômulo Batista Fernandes, Centro Estadual de Unidades de Conservação do Amazônas, Secretaria de Estado do Meio Ambiente e Desenvolvimento Sustentável do Amazonas
João Valsecchi, Instituto de Desenvolvimento Sustentável Mamirauá
Full Text: HTML
Biological resource monitoring systems are implemented in many countries and often depend on the participation of local people. It has been suggested that these systems empower local participants while promoting conservation. We reviewed three wildlife monitoring systems in indigenous lands and sustainable development reserves in Brazilian Amazonia and one in Namibian Caprivi conservancies, analyzing the strategies adopted and conditions that facilitated local empowerment, as well as potential impacts on conservation. This provided insights into potential avenues to strengthen empowerment outcomes of monitoring systems in Latin America and Africa. We assessed four dimensions of empowerment at individual and community scales: psychological, social, economic, and political. The conditions that facilitated local empowerment included the value of natural resources, rights to trade and manage resources, political organization of communities, and collaboration by stakeholders. The wide range of strategies to empower local people included intensifying local participation, linking them to local education, feeding information back to communities, purposefully selecting participants, paying for monitoring services, marketing monitored resources, and inserting local people into broader politics. Although communities were socially and politically empowered, the monitoring systems more often promoted individual empowerment. Marketing of natural resources promoted higher economic empowerment in conservancies in Namibia, whereas information dissemination was better in Brazil because of integrated education programs. We suggest that practitioners take advantage of local facilitating conditions to enhance the empowerment of communities, bearing in mind that increasing autonomy to make management decisions may not agree with international conservation goals. Our comparative analysis of cases in Latin America and Africa allows for a greater understanding of the relationships between resource monitoring systems, local empowerment, and conservation.
Acre; Amazônas; Caprivi; community participation; decentralization; indigenous people; protected area; wildlife management
Copyright © 2012 by the author(s). Published here under license by The Resilience Alliance. This article is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You may share and adapt the work for noncommercial purposes provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license.