Ecology and Society Ecology and Society
E&S Home > Vol. 15, Iss. 4 > Art. 11 > Abstract Open Access Publishing 
Co-engineering Participatory Water Management Processes: Theory and Insights from Australian and Bulgarian Interventions

Katherine A. Daniell, Centre for Policy Innovation, The Australian National University
Ian White, The Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University
Nils Ferrand, Gestion de l’Eau, Acteurs et Usages (UMR G-EAU), Cemagref
Irina S. Ribarova, University of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy
Peter Coad, Hornsby Shire Council
Jean-Emmanuel Rougier, Lisode
Matthew Hare, UN-Water Decade Programme on Capacity Development (UNW-DPC), United Nations University
Natalie A. Jones, School of Natural and Rural Systems Management, University of Queensland
Albena Popova, University of Architecture, Civil Engineering and Geodesy
Dominique Rollin, Gestion de l’Eau, Acteurs et Usages (UMR G-EAU), Cemagref
Pascal Perez, College of Asia and the Pacific, The Australian National University; Marine and Atmospheric Research Division, Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO)
Stewart Burn, Land and Water, Australian Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO)

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-03567-150411

Full Text: HTML   
Download Citation


Abstract

Broad-scale, multi-governance level, participatory water management processes intended to aid collective decision making and learning are rarely initiated, designed, implemented, and managed by one person. These processes mostly emerge from some form of collective planning and organization activities because of the stakes, time, and budgets involved in their implementation. Despite the potential importance of these collective processes for managing complex water-related social–ecological systems, little research focusing on the project teams that design and organize participatory water management processes has ever been undertaken. We have begun to fill this gap by introducing and outlining the concept of a co-engineering process and examining how it impacts the processes and outcomes of participatory water management. We used a hybrid form of intervention research in two broad-scale, multi-governance level, participatory water management processes in Australia and Bulgaria to build insights into these co-engineering processes. We examined how divergent objectives and conflict in the project teams were negotiated, and the impacts of this co-engineering on the participatory water management processes. These investigations showed: (1) that language barriers may aid, rather than hinder, the process of stakeholder appropriation, collective learning and skills transferal related to the design and implementation of participatory water management processes; and (2) that diversity in co-engineering groups, if managed positively through collaborative work and integrative negotiations, can present opportunities and not just challenges for achieving a range of desired outcomes for participatory water management processes. A number of areas for future research on co-engineering participatory water management processes are also highlighted.

Key words

co-engineering; conflict; multiple objectives; negotiation; participatory process; planning; water management

Copyright © 2010 by the author(s). Published here under license by The Resilience Alliance. This article  is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.  You may share and adapt the work for noncommercial purposes provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license.

Top
Ecology and Society. ISSN: 1708-3087