Competing Claims on Natural Resources: What Role for Science?
Ken E. Giller, Wageningen University
Cees Leeuwis, Wageningen University
Jens A. Andersson, Wageningen University; University of the Witwatersrand
Wim Andriesse, Wageningen University
Arie Brouwer, Wageningen University
Peter Frost, University of Zimbabwe
Paul Hebinck, Wageningen University
Ignas Heitkönig, Wageningen University
Martin K. van Ittersum, Wageningen University
Maja Slingerland, Wageningen University
Henk Udo, Wageningen University
Tom Veldkamp, Wageningen University
Claudius van de Vijver, Wageningen University
Mark T. van Wijk, Wageningen University
Pieter Windmeijer, Wageningen University
Full Text: HTML
Competing claims on natural resources become increasingly acute, with the poor being most vulnerable to adverse outcomes of such competition. A major challenge for science and policy is to progress from facilitating univocal use to guiding stakeholders in dealing with potentially conflicting uses of natural resources. The development of novel, more equitable, management options that reduce rural poverty is key to achieving sustainable use of natural resources and the resolution of conflicts over them. Here, we describe an interdisciplinary and interactive approach for: (i) the understanding of competing claims and stakeholder objectives; (ii) the identification of alternative resource use options, and (iii) the scientific support to negotiation processes between stakeholders. Central to the outlined approach is a shifted perspective on the role of scientific knowledge in society. Understanding scientific knowledge as entering societal arenas and as fundamentally negotiated, the role of the scientist becomes a more modest one, a contributor to ongoing negotiation processes among stakeholders. Scientists can, therefore, not merely describe and explain resource-use dynamics and competing claims, but in doing so, they should actively contribute to negotiation processes between stakeholders operating at different scales (local, national, regional, and global). Together with stakeholders, they explore alternatives that can contribute to more sustainable and equitable use of natural resources and, where possible, design new technical options and institutional arrangements.
agricultural science; conflict; ecology; level; methodology; natural resource management; scale; social science; sustainable agriculture
Copyright © 2008 by the author(s). Published here under license by The Resilience Alliance. This article is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You may share and adapt the work for noncommercial purposes provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license.