Ecology and Society Ecology and Society
E&S Home > Vol. 13, Iss. 1 > Art. 11 > Abstract Open Access Publishing 
Assessing the Resilience of a River Management Regime: Informal Learning in a Shadow Network in the Tisza River Basin

Jan Sendzimir, IIASA
Piotr Magnuszewski, IIASA; Wroclaw University of Technology
Zsuzsanna Flachner, Research Institute for Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry of Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Peter Balogh, Village of Nagykörü
Geza Molnar, Bokartis
Attila Sarvari, Thistle (“Cötkény”) Alliance for Regional Development
Zsuzsanna Nagy, Corvinus University of Budapest


Full Text: HTML   
Download Citation


Global sources of change offer unprecedented challenges to conventional river management strategies, which no longer appear capable of credibly addressing a trap: the failure of conventional river defense engineering to manage rising trends of disordering extreme events, including frequency and intensity of floods, droughts, and water stagnation in the Hungarian reaches of the Tisza River Basin. Extreme events punctuate trends of stagnation or decline in the ecosystems, economies, and societies of this river basin that extend back decades, and perhaps, centuries. These trends may be the long-term results of defensive strategies of the historical river management regime that reflect a paradigm dating back to the Industrial Revolution: “Protect the Landscape from the River.” Since then all policies have defaulted to the imperatives of this paradigm such that it became the convention underlying the current river management regime. As an exponent of this convention the current river management regimes’ methods, concepts, infrastructure, and paradigms that reinforce one another in setting the basin’s development trajectory, have proven resilient to change from wars, political, and social upheaval for centuries. Failure to address the trap makes the current river management regime’s resilience appear detrimental to the region’s future development prospects and prompts demand for transformation to a more adaptive river management regime. Starting before transition to democracy, a shadow network has generated multiple dialogues in Hungary, informally exploring the roots of this trap as part of a search for ideas and methods to revitalize the region. We report on how international scientists joined one dialogue, applying system dynamics modeling tools to explore barriers and bridges to transformation of the current river management regime and develop the capacity for participatory science to expand the range of perspectives that inform, monitor, and revise learning, policy, and the practice of river management.

Key words

flooding; floodplain; regime shift; resilience;Tisza River; transformability.

Copyright © 2008 by the author(s). Published here under license by The Resilience Alliance. This article is under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. You may share and adapt the work provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license.

Ecology and Society. ISSN: 1708-3087