Ecology and Society Ecology and Society
E&S Home > Vol. 27, Iss. 1 > Art. 14 > Abstract Open Access Publishing 
Dynamics of pastoral traditional ecological knowledge: a global state-of-the-art review

Abolfazl Sharifian, Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran; Centre for Ecological Research, Institute of Ecology and Botany, 2163 Vácrátót, Hungary
Álvaro Fernández-Llamazares, Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS), Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, FI-00014, Helsinki, Finland; Global Change and Conservation Lab, Organismal and Evolutionary Research Program, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, FI-00014, Helsinki, Finland
Hussein T Wario, Center for Research and Development, Drylands, Kenya
Zsolt Molnár, Centre for Ecological Research, Institute of Ecology and Botany, 2163 Vácrátót, Hungary
Mar Cabeza, Helsinki Institute of Sustainability Science (HELSUS), Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, FI-00014, Helsinki, Finland; Global Change and Conservation Lab, Organismal and Evolutionary Research Program, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, FI-00014, Helsinki, Finland

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-12918-270114

Full Text: HTML   
Download Citation


Abstract

Traditional ecological knowledge enables pastoralists to cope with social-ecological changes, thereby increasing the sustainability of their practices and fostering social-ecological resilience. Yet, there is a significant knowledge gap concerning the extent to which pastoral traditional ecological knowledge has changed over time at the global level. We aim to fill this gap through a systematic literature review of 288 scientific studies on pastoral traditional ecological knowledge. We reviewed 152 papers in detail (selected randomly from the 288) for their content, and focused specifically on 61 papers that explicitly mentioned one of the four types of knowledge transition (i.e., retention, erosion, adaptation, or hybridization). Studies on pastoral traditional knowledge represent less than 3% of all the scholarly literature on traditional ecological knowledge. Geographical distribution of the 288 case studies was largely biased. Knowledge domains of pastoral knowledge such as herd and livestock management, forage and medicinal plants, and landscape and wildlife were relatively equally covered; however, climate-related knowledge was less often studied. Of the 63 papers that explicitly mentioned transition of pastoral traditional ecological knowledge, 52 reported erosion, and only 11 studies documented explicitly knowledge retention, adaptation, or hybridization of traditional knowledge. Thus, adaptation and hybridization was understudied, although some case studies showed that adaptation and hybridization of knowledge can efficiently help pastoralists navigate among social-ecological changes. Based on the review, we found 13 drivers which were mentioned as the main reasons for knowledge transition among which social-cultural changes, formal schooling, abandonment of pastoral activities, and transition to a market economy were most often reported. We conclude that future research should focus more on the diverse dynamics of pastoral traditional knowledge, be more careful in distinguishing the four knowledge transition types, and analyze how changes in knowledge impact change in pastoral practices and lifestyles. Understanding these phenomena could help pastoralists’ adaptations and support their stewardship of their rangeland ecosystems and biocultural diversity.

Key words

Indigenous knowledge; pastoralism; rangelands; social-ecological systems; transition; transmission

Copyright © 2022 by the author(s). Published here under license by The Resilience Alliance. This article is under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. You may share and adapt the work provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license.

Top
Ecology and Society. ISSN: 1708-3087