Ecology and Society Ecology and Society
E&S Home > Vol. 25, Iss. 3 > Art. 16 > Abstract Open Access Publishing 
Analyzing procedural equity in government-led community-based forest management

Rachel S. Friedman, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
Jonathan R. Rhodes, School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia
Angela J. Dean, Institute for Future Environments, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; School of Biology and Environmental Science, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Elizabeth A. Law, School of Biological Sciences, University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, Australia; Norwegian Institute for Nature Research (NINA), Trondheim, Norway
Truly Santika, Natural Resources Institute (NRI), University of Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, UK; Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology (DICE), School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK; Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions (CEED), University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Sugeng Budiharta, Purwodadi Botanic Garden, Indonesian Institute of Sciences (LIPI), Pasuruan, Indonesia
Joseph A. Hutabarat, Fauna & Flora International - Indonesia Programme, Jakarta, Indonesia
Tito P. Indrawan, Fauna & Flora International - Indonesia Programme, Jakarta, Indonesia
Ahmad Kusworo, Fauna & Flora International - Indonesia Programme, Jakarta, Indonesia; The Nature Conservancy - Indonesia Programme, Jakarta, Indonesia
Erik Meijaard, Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology (DICE), School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK; Borneo Futures, Bandar Seri Begawan, Brunei
Freya A.V. St. John, School of Natural Sciences, Bangor University, Bangor, UK
Matthew J. Struebig, Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology (DICE), School of Anthropology and Conservation, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
Kerrie A. Wilson, Institute for Future Environments, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-11710-250316

Full Text: HTML   
Download Citation


Abstract

Participatory approaches to forest management have been promoted as a means of returning rights historically removed, and as a way of managing natural resources sustainably, fairly, and to improve livelihoods in communities. Top-down models of community-based forest management take the perspective that if people feel ownership over, have a voice in decisions about, and can benefit from surrounding ecosystems, then they will be motivated to maintain and protect them. However, even participatory approaches, such as community-based forest management, may not always result in clear positive outcomes for involvement in decision making and forest conservation. We examine whether an Indonesian government initiative for community-based forest management was positively associated with community members' participation in local decision making and support for conservation and sustainable management of forest resources, in the context of state-owned lands. We used household questionnaire data to compare villages with and without a community forest, and community forests over time in a case study region of West Kalimantan. Analyzing forest visitations, conservation support, and indicators of procedural equity, we found no consistent association between having a community forest and higher levels of participation in decision making or household support for forest conservation. However, well-being indicators were positively associated with more active participation. The level of support for forest conservation was also positively related to households' leadership in village institutions and higher levels of well-being, particularly subjective well-being, land tenure, and material wealth. These social-demographic factors are important considerations when designing and implementing community-based forest management, which strives for fair and just decision-making processes along with forest conservation. The findings highlight how existing socioeconomic contexts factor into local institutions, and that accounting for these in program design and implementation may help address existing social inequalities that influence achieving joint social and ecological objectives.

Key words

community-based forest management; conservation; environmental decision making; Indonesia; participation; social equity

Copyright © 2020 by the author(s). Published here under license by The Resilience Alliance. This article is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. You may share and adapt the work for noncommercial purposes provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license.

Top
Ecology and Society. ISSN: 1708-3087