Ecology and Society Ecology and Society
E&S Home > Vol. 24, Iss. 3 > Art. 26 > Abstract Open Access Publishing 
What is governance in global telecoupling?

Jens Newig, Research Group Governance and Sustainability, Leuphana University Lüneburg, Germany
Andrea Lenschow, Jean-Monnet-Chair of European Integration, Osnabrück University, Germany
Edward Challies, Waterways Centre for Freshwater Management, University of Canterbury, New Zealand; Research Group Governance and Sustainability, Leuphana University Lüneburg, Germany
Benedetta Cotta, Research Group Governance and Sustainability, Leuphana University Lüneburg, Germany
Almut Schilling-Vacaflor, Jean-Monnet-Chair of European Integration, Osnabrück University, Germany

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-11178-240326

Full Text: HTML   
Download Citation


Abstract

The concept of telecoupling is increasingly used as a framework to understand globally distant interconnections and their sustainability implications. Although there is a growing research focus on issues of governance related to global telecoupling, there appears little consensus over the meaning of “governance” in this respect. Papers in the recent Ecology and Society special feature titled “Telecoupling: A New Frontier for Global Sustainability” reveal quite different understandings of the telecoupling-governance relationship. We want to suggest that greater clarity and a common understanding of how governance figures in telecoupled systems will aid constructive dialogue on how to govern telecoupling toward more sustainable pathways in the face of pressing global social and environmental issues. This response, though not aiming to define a single, definitive framework of governance as it pertains to telecoupling, seeks to identify three distinct perspectives applied to governance in the context of global telecoupling: (1) governance by states or other actors that induces or fosters telecoupling in the first place, often irrespective of its sustainability implications; (2) governance mainly by private companies that coordinates telecoupled flows; and (3) governance by states, nonstate actors, and hybrid or multistakeholder initiatives that aims to address the negative externalities of telecoupling. By distinguishing these perspectives, we aim to make underlying understandings of governance explicit, and to foster further constructive exchange on the topic.

Key words

global commodity chains; global environmental governance; inter-regional connectedness; sustainability governance

Copyright © 2019 by the author(s). Published here under license by The Resilience Alliance. This article  is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.  You may share and adapt the work for noncommercial purposes provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license.

Top
Ecology and Society. ISSN: 1708-3087