Ecology and Society Ecology and Society
E&S Home > Vol. 23, Iss. 4 > Art. 40 > Abstract Open Access Publishing 
At the nexus of problem-solving and critical research

Yahia Mahmoud, Department of Human Geography, Lund University, Sweden
Anne Jerneck, Centre for Sustainability Studies, LUCSUS, Lund University, Sweden
Annica Kronsell, Department of Political Science, Lund University, Sweden; School of Global Studies, Gothenburg University, Sweden
Karin Steen, Centre for Sustainability Studies, LUCSUS, Lund University, Sweden

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-10458-230440

Full Text: HTML   
Download Citation


Abstract

The analytical distinction between critical and problem-solving research is useful. At the onset of research, the latter takes the world as it is while the former questions it. Yet, in striving to integrate social and natural dimensions of sustainability such a distinction may surface as a methodological obstacle. We illustrate how combining critical with problem-solving approaches can help us imagine, understand, and enable transitions to sustainability. First, we trace the historical divide and potential complementarity between critical and problem-solving approaches in the natural and social sciences and how critical approaches in the social sciences are informed by critical theory. Inspired by Robert Cox, we then analyze a set of PhD theses in an interdisciplinary research program engaging in critical and problem-solving research, on and for sustainability. We do so based on Cox’s terminology, especially the concepts of ideas, institutions, material capabilities, and frameworks for action, and then show how selected research narratives apply them. To conclude, we emphasize that integrated understandings of human-environmental dynamics are facilitated by multiscalar approaches, theoretical and methodological pluralism, and a combination of natural and social science theory, typical of the interdisciplinary research field of sustainability science.

Key words

human-environmental dynamics; interdisciplinarity; methodological pluralism; sustainability science; sustainability studies

Copyright © 2018 by the author(s). Published here under license by The Resilience Alliance. This article  is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.  You may share and adapt the work for noncommercial purposes provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license.

Top
Ecology and Society. ISSN: 1708-3087