Table 2. Structural manipulation trends differences (mean ±SD) for pre- to post-treatment ecological group measures at Quincy Bluff and Wetlands Natural Area. Bias-adjusted effect size, 95% confidence interval of effect size, and F-values and probabilities for analysis-of-variance (ANOVA) tests are reported. ANOVA models tested main effects of the structural manipulationtreatment (n = 12) against the control (n = 10). Significance values of the tests are indicated in bold at P < 0.05, whereas values for marginal significance (P < 0.10) are in italics.

Ecological group  
Control
 
Treatment
 
Effect
 
95% CI
 
ANOVA
   
plot
 
plot
 
size
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lower
 
Upper
 
F
 
P
Canopy intercept  
-0.04
(±24.25)
 
-52.92
(±32.22)
 
-1.66
 
-3.10
 
-0.22
 
8.60
 
0.019
Species richness  
-1.40
(±1.67)
 
5.40
(±2.30)
 
3.05
 
1.23
 
4.87
 
28.54
 
< 0.001
Diversity  
-0.76
(±0.58)
 
1.24
(±0.33)
 
3.82
 
1.73
 
5.90
 
44.68
 
< 0.001
Evenness  
-0.22
(±0.20)
 
0.28
(±0.15)
 
2.55
 
0.88
 
4.22
 
20.03
 
0.002
Modal savanna  
-0.48
(±4.19)
 
12.12
(±12.16)
 
1.25
 
-0.10
 
2.61
 
4.80
 
0.060
Modal southern forest  
7.32
(±16.29)
 
-0.64
(±15.37)
 
-0.41
 
-1.71
 
0.80
 
0.63
 
0.450
Modal northern forest  
1.72
(±0.99)
 
1.00
(±2.24)
 
-0.38
 
-1.63
 
0.87
 
0.43
 
0.529
Modal grassland  
-9.08
(±8.77)
 
6.48
(±7.01)
 
1.77
 
0.31
 
3.23
 
9.60
 
0.015
Forbs  
-3.04
(±6.34)
 
5.76
(±3.09)
 
1.59
 
0.17
 
3.02
 
7.79
 
0.024
C3 grasses  
-1.44
(±3.32)
 
9.48
(±21.76)
 
0.63
 
-0.64
 
1.90
 
1.23
 
0.300
C4 grasses  
-1.32
(±6.83)
 
1.64
(±3.34)
 
0.50
 
-0.76
 
1.76
 
0.76
 
0.409
Sedges  
9.88
(±18.54)
 
-0.16
(±13.27)
 
-0.56
 
-1.83
 
0.70
 
0.97
 
0.354
Shrubs  
-6.92
(±10.85)
 
1.88
(±1.84)
 
1.02
 
-0.30
 
2.34
 
3.20
 
0.112
Ferns  
-5.6
(±10.92)
 
0
(±0)
 
0.65
 
-0.62
 
1.93
 
1.31
 
0.285
Trees  
1.36
(±2.91)
 
1.68
(±6.38)
 
0.06
 
-1.18
 
1.30
 
0.01
 
0.921
Legume  
-0.12
(±0.27)
 
0.56
(±1.53)
 
0.56
 
-0.71
 
1.82
 
0.96
 
0.357
Vines  
-1.04
(±2.44)
 
0
(±0)
 
0.53
 
-0.73
 
1.79
 
0.91
 
0.368