Table 1. Structural manipulation trends differences (mean ± SD) for pre- to post-treatment ecological group measures at Necedah National Wildlife Refuge. Bias-adjusted effect size, 95% confidence interval of effect size, and F-values and probabilities for analysis-of-variance (ANOVA) tests are reported. ANOVA models tested main effects of the structural manipulation treatment (n = 12) against the control (n = 10). Significance values of tests are indicated in bold at P < 0.05, whereas marginal significance values (P < 0.10) are in italics.

Ecological group  
Control
 
Treatment
 
Effect
 
95% CI
 
ANOVA
   
plot
 
plot
 
size
 
 
   
 
 
 
 
 
 
Lower
 
Upper
 
F
 
P
Canopy intercept  
-4.16
(±15.04)
 
-62.14
(±36.89)
 
-1.97
 
-3.04
 
-0.90
 
21.18
 
< 0.001
Species richness  
-1.92
(±3.23)
 
0.90
(±2.51)
 
0.92
 
0.04
 
1.81
 
5.04
 
0.036
Diversity  
-0.54
(±0.49)
 
0.66
(±0.95)
 
1.58
 
0.62
 
2.54
 
14.69
 
0.001
Evenness  
-0.14
(±0.18)
 
0.22
(±0.31)
 
1.45
 
0.50
 
2.39
 
12.35
 
0.002
Modal savanna  
3.73
(±7.16)
 
8.06
(±4.10)
 
0.70
 
-0.17
 
1.56
 
2.86
 
0.106
Modal southern forest  
16.43
(±12.90)
 
13.78
(±28.50)
 
-0.12
 
-0.96
 
0.72
 
0.08
 
0.775
Modal northern forest  
-1.92
(±6.37)
 
-0.54
(±3.60)
 
0.25
 
-0.59
 
1.09
 
0.37
 
0.551
Modal grassland  
0.17
(±6.50)
 
6.62
(±8.30)
 
0.84
 
-0.03
 
1.72
 
4.19
 
0.054
Forbs  
-0.58
(±3.14)
 
1.36
(±4.63)
 
0.48
 
-0.37
 
1.33
 
1.37
 
0.256
C3 grasses  
0.73
(±2.75)
 
13.28
(±12.44)
 
0.87
 
-0.01
 
1.74
 
11.63
 
0.003
C4 grasses  
-0.22
(±1.66)
 
0.52
(±0.98)
 
0.51
 
-0.34
 
1.36
 
1.53
 
0.230
Sedges  
17.63
(±13.34)
 
13.90
(±28.00)
 
-0.17
 
-1.01
 
0.67
 
0.17
 
0.686
Shrubs  
-0.57
(±6.16)
 
2.16
(±4.90)
 
0.47
 
-0.38
 
1.32
 
1.28
 
0.271
Ferns  
-0.70
(±0.73)
 
2.68
(±3.73)
 
1.27
 
0.35
 
2.19
 
6.39
 
0.020
Trees  
2.02
(±7.17)
 
3.36
(±3.29)
 
0.22
 
-0.62
 
1.07
 
0.30
 
0.592
Legume  
0.05
(±2.22)
 
0
(±0)
 
-0.03
 
-0.87
 
0.81
 
0.01
 
0.944
Vines  
0
(±0)
 
0
(±0)
 
0
 
0
 
0
 
0
 
0