ERRATUM (1). In the original published version of this manuscript, there
was an error in the sentence: Analysis of the biomass data indicates that potential
KS, both in the column labeled "Species A," can be identified within the tertiary
consumer and herbivore functional groups because they have proportional biomass
values that are significantly dominant within their functional groups.
The corrected sentence appears in full below.
Analysis of the biomass data indicates that potential KS, both in the column labeled "Species A," can be identified within the top carnivore and herbivore functional groups because they have proportional biomass values that are significantly dominant within their functional groups.