Home | Archives | About | Login | Submissions | Notify | Contact | Search

 ES Home > Vol. 5, No. 1 > Resp. 1

Copyright © 2001 by The Resilience Alliance

The following is the established format for referencing this article:
Sandhu, J. S. 2001. Fixed visions and visionaries. Response to Wayne Tyson (2000). "God, nature, and interpretation.". Conservation Ecology 5(1): r1. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol5/iss1/resp1/


Response to Wayne Tyson (2000). "God, Nature, and Interpretation"

Fixed Visions and Visionaries

Jaswinder S. Sandhu


Published: April 30, 2001


I read with interest the views of Holling (1999), Rogers et al. (2000), and Tyson (2000) on vision. As far as vision is concerned, I think it is an excellent topic that can continue to interest scientists forever. However, the sculpting or carving analogy used to represent vision seems a bit too static to me. A sculpture is an object that is rigid and fixed; it can never change once it has been created. I believe, on the contrary, that vision is something that is, and should be, constantly changing. Regardless of whether you start with only a hazy idea, as Holling did, or a clear view, such as the one that Rogers et al. claim to have had, vision must be dynamic. This is essential in a world where change is a law of nature.

Rogers et al. also make a compelling argument for seeking consensus in terms of vision, i.e., not allowing a single person's vision, or even the most mainstream, to dominate. If we cannot achieve this, then I think we deserve mismanagement of our resources.


RESPONSES TO THIS ARTICLE

Responses to this article are invited. If accepted for publication, your response will be hyperlinked to the article. To submit a comment, follow this link. To read comments already accepted, follow this link.


LITERATURE CITED

Holling, C. S. 1999. Visions: a personal essay. Conservation Ecology 3(1): 12. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/Journal/vol3/iss1/art12.

Rogers, K., D. Roux, and H. Biggs. 2000. The value of visions and art of visionaries. Response to C. S. (Buzz) Holling (1999). "Visions: a personal essay." Conservation Ecology 4(1): Response 1. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/Journal/vol4/iss1/resp1.

Tyson, W. 2000. God, nature, and interpretation. Response to Rogers et al. (2000). "The value of visions and art of visionaries." Conservation Ecology 4(2): Response 3. [online] URL: http://www.consecol.org/Journal/vol4/iss2/resp3.


Address of Correspondent:
Jaswinder S. Sandhu
22 Cordgrass Crescent
Brampton, Ontario, Canada L6R 1Y4
Phone: (905)799-7359
jassi@hotmail.com



Home | Archives | About | Login | Submissions | Notify | Contact | Search