Table 4. Results of the 3-class latent class model (LCM) including opinions on the ecosystem services of peatlands as explanatory variables for class membership. The class membership coefficients for Class 3 were fixed in order to identify the remaining coefficients. Number of respondents = 712.

Class 1:
Environmentalist
Class 2:
Production-oriented
Class 3:
Current use supporter
Coeff. Stand. error Coeff. Stand. error Coeff. Stand. error
Timber + *** -1.181 0.197 ** 0.347 0.155 -0.153 0.259
Timber - -0.458 0.459 *** -1.494 0.300 *** -3.064 0.647
Peat + *** -2.130 0.163 *** 1.013 0.097 -0.199 0.198
Peat - *** 2.656 0.231 *** -1.338 0.158 0.430 0.274
Protection ** 0.496 0.198 *** 0.539 0.154 *** 0.748 0.251
Restor + *** 1.478 0.173 -0.067 0.128 -0.097 0.177
Restor - -0.173 0.258 *** -0.638 0.171 -0.204 0.269
Intercept
 
0.179
 
0.243
 
0.212
 
0.176
 
*** 2.318
 
0.286
 
Class membership parameters
Intercept *** -0.956 0.317 -0.254 0.200
Employment and income *** -0.878 0.199 0.074 0.242
Hydrological problems ** 0.388 0.171 -0.237 0.144
Energy source *** -0.928 0.149 ** 0.506 0.224
Species and habitats *** 1.108 0.209 -0.128 0.168
Recreation * 0.318 0.171 -0.215 0.143
Class probabilities 0.636 0.197 0.167
RsqAdj 0.476
Log-likelihood -2407.935
AIC 1.164
BIC 1.218
*** significant at 0.01 level, ** significant at 0.05 level, * significant at 0.1 level