Table 5. Relationships between landowner study site and participant responses to closed-ended questionnaire items regarding the principles and structure of WfWs proposed ecosystem service approach to clearing IAPs on private land, Western Cape. Values are the frequency observed (expected) based on chi-square tests.

Landowner Study Site
Variable Wilderness Grabouw Citrusdal X2 p
Shared responsibility (n = 113) 4.67 0.32
shared 38 (39) 35 (35) 34 (33)
unshared 3 (2) 2 (2) 0 (2)
unsure 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (0)
Responsibility category (n = 112) 8.89 0.064
solely or primarily landowner 28 (23) 22 (21) 13 (19)
equal landowner and government 8 (11) 11 (10) 11 (9)
solely or primarily government 5 (7) 4 (6) 10 (6)
Regulatory enforcement (n = 112) 6.99 0.14
agree 32 (26) 23 (24) 18 (23)
disagree 7 (12) 12 (11) 15 (11)
unsure 1 (2) 2 (2) 2 (2)
Motivational incentives (n = 111) 0.831 0.081
agree 39 (38) 36 (34) 30 (33)
disagree 1 (2) 0 (2) 4 (2)
unsure 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (0)
Monetary incentives (n = 111) 2.68 0.61
agree 38 (37) 33 (33) 31 (32)
disagree 2 (3) 3 (3) 3 (3)
unsure 0 (0) 0 (0) 1 (0)
Quantity of proposed financial incentive (n = 112) 15.0 0.02
fully sufficient 13 (15) 18 (14) 10 (13)
somewhat sufficient 13 (15) 17 (14) 11 (13)
not at all sufficient 11 (9) 2 (9) 13 (8)
unsure 3 (1) 1 (1) 0 (1)
Duration of proposed financial incentive (n =112) 12.2 0.057
fully sufficient 15 (14) 16 (13) 9 (13)
somewhat sufficient 11 (13) 15 (12) 10 (11)
not at all sufficient 11 (10) 3 (10) 15 (9)
unsure 3 (3) 3 (2) 1 (2)