Table 4. Relationships between stakeholder group and participant responses to closed-ended questionnaire items regarding the principles and structure of WfWs proposed ecosystem service approach to clearing IAPs on private land, Western Cape. Values are the frequency observed (expected) based on chi-square tests.

Stakeholder Group
Variable Landowners Conservation Professionals WfW Managers X2 p
Shared responsibility (n = 156) 19.9 .001
shared 107 (104) 18 (23) 18 (17)
unshared 5 (6) 3 (1) 0 (1)
unsure 1 (4) 4 (1) 0 (1)
Responsibility category (n = 131) 1.04 0.79
solely or primarily landowner 63 (61) -- 8 (10)
equal landowner and government 30 (31) -- 6 (5)
solely or primarily government 19 (20) -- 4 (3)
Regulatory enforcement (n = 155) 9.50 0.05
agree 73 (80) 20 (18) 17 (13)
disagree 34 (28) 3 (6) 1 (4)
unsure 5 (5) 2 (1) 0 (1)
Motivational incentives (n = 154) 1.24 0.87
agree 105 (106) 24 (24) 18 (17)
disagree 5 (4) 1 (1) 0 (1)
unsure 1(1) 0 (0) 0 (1)
Monetary incentives (n = 154) 23.5 <0.001
agree 102 (96) 22 (22) 9 (16)
disagree 8 (14) 3 (3) 8 (2)
unsure 1 (1) 0 (0) 1 (0)
Quantity of proposed financial incentive (n = 150) 31.1 <0.001
fully sufficient 41 (31) 0 (7) 1 (4)
somewhat sufficient 41(48) 17 (11) 6 (6)
not at all sufficient 26(24) 2 (5) 4 (3)
unsure 4 (9) 6 (2) 2 (1)
Duration of proposed financial incentive (n = 150) 35.4 <0.001
fully sufficient 40 (31) 1 (7) 0 (4)
somewhat sufficient 36 (48) 20 (11) 8 (6)
not at all sufficient 29 (23) 0 (5) 2 (3)
unsure 7 (11) 4 (2) 3 (1)