Table 6. Sensitivity of the map to data sources. Fraction of pixels that changed dominant forest management approach (FMA) after removal of the different data sources (a–h) and application of equal weights to minor and major effects. (FMA I: nature reserve; II: close-to-nature; III: combined objective; IV: even-aged forestry; V: short rotation)

All I II III IV V
α 0.13 0.49 0.03 0.03 0.75 0.48
a * b species * biogeo 0.10 0.02 0.11 0.09 0.25 0.37
c slope 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.05
d proximity 1 0.79 0.23 0.35 1.00 0.00 0.97
e proximity 2 0.13 0.22 0.62 0.04 0.11 0.09
f forest cover 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.96 0.05
g stand area 0.74 0.40 0.33 0.93 0.15 0.04
h Natura2000 0.36 0.40 0.30 0.35 0.30 0.78