Table 3. Name and relative likelihood (weight) of the five most frequent hazards in the eight regional case studies
The relative likelihood
of hazards was estimated as the percentage of trees affected by each of the five
hazards at the stand level, according to the patterns of occurrence observed
during the last 30–50 years. Then percentages were transformed in relative
proportions (sum = 100%)
| |
| |
|
Case study |
Hazard #1 |
Hazard #2 |
Hazard #3 |
Hazard #4 |
Hazard #5 |
| |
|
PT-Euc |
leaf rust |
leaf beetle |
gall insect |
fire |
stem canker |
|
|
M. spp. |
G. scutellatus |
C. spatulata |
|
B. dothidea |
|
|
43% |
26% |
26% |
4% |
1% |
|
FR-Mar |
defoliator |
stem borer |
wind |
fire |
root rot |
|
|
T. pityocampa |
D. sylvestrella |
|
|
H. annosum |
|
|
47% |
47% |
3% |
2% |
1% |
|
UK-Sit |
game |
wind |
weevil |
aphid |
fire |
|
|
C. elaphus |
|
H. abietis |
E. abietinum |
|
|
|
81% |
9% |
5% |
4% |
1% |
|
UK-Sco |
game |
wind |
weevil |
foliar disease |
fire |
|
|
C. elaphus |
|
H. abietis |
D. septosporum |
|
|
|
81% |
9% |
5% |
4% |
1% |
|
PL-Sco |
game |
root rot |
weevil |
sawfly |
wind |
|
|
C. elaphus |
H. annosum |
H. abietis |
A. nemoralis |
|
|
|
47% |
19% |
15% |
12% |
7% |
|
SU-Sco |
root rot |
weevil |
game |
bark beetle |
wind |
|
|
H. annosum |
H. abietis |
|
I. typographus |
|
|
|
38% |
28% |
19% |
8% |
8% |
|
GE-Nor |
root rot |
wind |
bark beetle |
snow |
game |
|
|
H. annosum |
|
I. typographus |
|
C.s elaphus |
|
|
58% |
20% |
20% |
1% |
1% |
|
AU-Nor |
bark beetle |
wind |
snow |
game |
sawfly |
|
|
I. typographus |
|
|
C. elaphus |
P. abietina |
|
|
25% |
25% |
20% |
20% |
10% |
| |
|
Most frequent biotic hazards : Mycosphaerella spp, Gonipterus
scutellatus, Ctenarytaina spatulata, Botryosphaeria dothidea, Thaumetopoea
pityocampa, Dioryctria sylvestrella, Cervus elaphus, Heterobasidion annosum,
Hylobius abietis, Elatobium abietinum, Dothistroma septosporum, Acantholyda
nemoralis, Ips typographus, Pristiphora abietina. |