Table 2. Condition of mainland BioNet remnants and other city areas in relation to the urban edge.
| |
| |
|
|
Upland† |
Lowland‡ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Site condition |
Inside (%) |
Outside (%) |
Subtotal (ha) |
Inside (%) |
Outside (%) |
Subtotal (ha) |
Total (ha) |
| |
|
Natural, high quality§ |
0 |
100 |
42,423 |
18 |
82 |
24,048 |
66,471 |
|
Natural, medium quality¦ |
9 |
91 |
1240 |
47 |
53 |
10,808 |
12,048 |
|
Natural, low quality¶ |
10 |
90 |
881 |
33 |
67 |
6650 |
7531 |
|
Natural, unselected# |
11 |
89 |
2621 |
27 |
73 |
7225 |
9846 |
|
Total natural |
1 |
99 |
47,165 |
28 |
72 |
48,731 |
95,896 |
|
Transformed†† |
68 |
32 |
10,999 |
54 |
46 |
138,505 |
|
| |
†Associated with mountain chains.
‡Cape Flats and West Coast forelands, incorporating the low shale and granite hills.
§Sites retain biodiversity structure, diversity, and function, but may support some invasive alien vegetation.
¦Sites have lost some structural components and diversity.
¶Sites have lost structure and a high proportion of diversity, but soils are intact and vegetation is considered restorable.
#Natural areas not included in the Biodiversity Network.
††Developed or cultivated areas that are considered nonrestorable.