Table 5. Indicators of relational and cognitive change as well as agreement broken out by initiative
| |
| |
|
|
Working Groups |
Advisory Councils |
p |
|
|
|
|
| Items |
N |
Mean† |
N |
Mean†
|
value†† |
| |
|
Relational change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of the involvement process, I have better working relationships
with the other participants. |
123 |
1.68 (0.70) |
39 |
2.00 (0.61) |
0.006 |
|
As a result of the involvement process, I feel part of a group trying to
solve a common problem. |
129 |
1.60 (0.72) |
42 |
1.98 (0.75) |
0.002 |
|
I would be happy to work again with the same participants in a similar
involvement process. |
129 |
1.54 (0.69) |
43 |
1.79 (0.74) |
0.036 |
|
Cognitive change |
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a result of the involvement process, I have a better understanding of
water resources and RBM. |
127 |
1.47 (0.70) |
44 |
1.48 (0.63) |
0.736 |
|
As a result of the involvement process, I have a better understanding of
the concerns and interests of other participants. |
127 |
1.64 (0.66) |
44 |
1.66 (0.64) |
0.799 |
|
As a result of the process, I altered my views about important issues and
problems for water resources and RBM. |
128 |
2.37 (0.94) |
43 |
2.49 (1.03) |
0.567 |
|
Agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
The involvement process contributed to the development of a common view
among the participants of the current status of the RBD as well as immediate
problems and their causes. |
126 |
1.75 (0.73) |
35 |
2.34 (0.87) |
0.000 |
| |
† Means based on four-point response scale, ranging from 1 =
strongly agree to 4 = strongly disagree, standard deviation in brackets;
†† Significant at
p < 0.01.