Table 2. Description of process and outcome indicators investigated in this study
| |
| |
|
Social learning conditions and processes |
(adapted from Webler et al.
1995, Schusler et al. 2003, Mostert et al. 2007) |
| |
|
|
|
|
Inclusiveness |
All relevant views are represented in the process. |
|
Extended engagement |
The process provides opportunities for prolonged and frequent
interaction. |
|
Opportunities for information exchange |
The process allows participants to exchange knowledge and
information. |
|
Opportunities for dialog and interaction |
Participants should be able to engage in in-depth discussions and dialog.
|
|
Process control |
The process allows participants to define the collaboration agenda and
procedures. |
|
Open communication |
Participants openly share information and articulate and expose their
views and interests. |
|
Equal participation |
Communication and interaction are characterized by equal participation by
all parties involved. |
| |
|
Social learning outcomes |
(adapted from Webler et al. 1995, Schusler
et al. 2003, Röling. 2002, Mostert et al. 2007) |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relational change |
{ |
Relationship building |
Participants establish new relationships and develop a sense of community.
|
|
Trust building |
Participants believe in the honesty and commitment of other group
members. |
|
Cognitive change |
{ |
Knowledge and reflection |
Participants learn about and reflect on RBM, their understanding of the
management problem at hand and that of other group members. |
|
Agreement† |
|
Developing common views |
Participants develop a shared understanding of the environmental situation.
|
| |
† The extent to which stakeholder groups developed a
common view of the environmental situation at hand is used as an intermediate
indicator for process outcomes.