|
Area management |
Sub-area 1 |
|
Sub-area 2 |
|
Sub-area 3 |
|
Sub-area 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case |
a |
b |
c |
|
a |
b |
c |
|
a |
b |
c |
|
a |
b |
c |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of lines |
13 |
15 |
10 |
|
15 |
15 |
10 |
|
12 |
15 |
10 |
|
14 |
15 |
10 |
|
Line distance (m) |
8 |
7 |
10 |
|
7 |
7 |
10 |
|
9 |
7 |
10 |
|
8 |
7 |
10 |
|
Sock distance (m) |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
|
0.6 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
|
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
|
0.5 |
0.4 |
0.5 |
|
Sock length (m) |
3.0 |
3.0 |
3.0 |
|
3.5 |
3.5 |
3.5 |
|
4.0 |
4.0 |
4.0 |
|
4.5 |
4.5 |
4.5 |
|
Number of farms in the area |
|
|
13 |
|
|
|
18 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
12 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mussel wet weight (kg/m of sock) |
11.2 |
9.9 |
17.1 |
|
9.8 |
9.7 |
16.9 |
|
11.3 |
9.3 |
16.0 |
|
13.1 |
10.1 |
17.5 |
|
Average ind. mussel weight (g) |
7.5 |
6.6 |
11.4 |
|
6.5 |
6.5 |
11.2 |
|
7.5 |
6.2 |
10.6 |
|
8.7 |
6.7 |
11.6 |
|
Total production (tn) |
72.1 |
73.6 |
67.6 |
|
79.6 |
83.9 |
78.07 |
|
89.1 |
92.0 |
84.4 |
|
108.6 |
113.0 |
104.0 |
|
Costs (€) |
26,284 |
27,001 |
25,209 |
|
27,001 |
27,001 |
25,209 |
|
25,925 |
27,001 |
25,209 |
|
26,643 |
27,001 |
25,209 |
|
Individual profit (€) |
2,156 |
2,026 |
1,483 |
|
4,422 |
6,113 |
5,591 |
|
9,211 |
9,300 |
8,079 |
|
16,196 |
17,587 |
15,847 |
|
Individual profit (higher quality) |
|
|
8,156 |
|
|
|
13,291 |
|
|
|
16,400 |
|
|
|
26,110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total area profit (€) |
Case a |
495,026 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case b |
541,533 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case c (normal quality) |
489,541 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case c (higher quality) |
937,924 |
|