Table 3. The participating Limfjord stakeholders and their main concerns prior to System Approach Framework (SAF) implementation.
| |
| |
|
Stakeholders |
Main concerns and opinions prior to SAF
implementation |
| |
|
Agriculture farmers† |
Concern related to potential restriction on use of
fertilizers. |
|
Commercial fishers |
Concern about eutrophication and loss of profitable
finfish fisheries. |
|
Environmental managers |
National implementation of EU
Directives. |
|
Fisheries managers |
Management and development of mussel and finfish fishery
according to regulations and negatively affected yield by decreasing catchable
stocks. |
|
Mussel farmers |
Development of profitable mussel farms, wish to reduce
hypoxia and harmful algal blooms (HAB) events, avoid mussel predators and filter-feeding
competitors. |
|
Mussel fishers |
Maintaining mussel fishery profitability, wish to reduce
hypoxia events, avoid mussel predators/competitors, and secure natural mussel
recruitment. |
|
Nature conservation NGOs |
Wish to decrease Total N and P loadings to reduce
hypoxia events, secure shallow-water mussels as food for foraging birds,
maintain high biodiversity, and secure recreational use of the
Limfjord. |
|
Recreational fishers |
Restoration of a recreational finfish fishery in the
Limfjord. |
|
Municipals (Tourisms, Harbors) |
Management of the Limfjord environment and use of goods
and services. |
|
| |
†Some
stakeholders were only present at the initial meeting and have not seen and
discussed the simulation results.
|