Table 5. Descriptive statistics of the respondents on conservation agreements for 2010

Key Variables N Range Mean Std. Deviation Frequency/ # of individuals
I. Participation in CA 100 2 1.2 ±0.46 -
a) No answer
b) Yes
c) No
3
75
22
II. Type of CA schemes joined 100 4 2.3 ±0.18 -
a) Clonal material
b) Communal jungle rubber
c) Mini-hydro
d) Fish conservation
45
45
55
34
III. Willingness to continue or participate 100 2 1.10 ±0.62 -
a) No answer
b) Yes
c) No
15
60
25
IV. Conservation agreement is enough to maintain the rubber agroforests 100 2 1.04 ±0.60 -
a) No answer
b) Yes
c) No
15
66
19
V. Preferred land use for financial reasons 100 5 1.62 ±1.15 -
a) No answer
b) Rubber agroforest
c) Monoculture rubber
d) Oil palm plantation
e) Others (e.g., rice)
13
44
18
20
5
VI. Preferred land use for agro-biodiversity conservation 100 6 1.33 ±1.10 -
a) No answer
b) Rubber agroforest
c) Forest
d) fallow areas
e) Other
f) Not sure
15
56
5
10
10
4