Table 2. Trends in management cycle related to project effectiveness.
| |
| |
|
Trend |
Attributes affecting informative evaluation |
| |
|
|
|
Effective |
Ineffective |
| |
|
Scope of project objectives |
Appropriate to local/national priorities |
Focused on global donor priorities with little value to local/national
priorities |
| |
Realistic given available timeframe, resources and capacity |
Overly ambitious given resource and capacity constraints |
| |
|
Implementation of project work plan |
Manageable list of project activities scheduled in work plan |
Exhaustive list of project activities addressing disparate
objectives |
| |
Sufficient time allocated to consultation |
No time allocated for consultation causing delays in implementation
|
| |
Adequate resources available |
Insufficient resources |
| |
|
Quality of data on project outcomes |
Existing baseline data |
Biased, limited or no baseline data |
| |
Integrated monitoring present |
Monitoring system absent or inadequate |
| |
Linked to stated objectives and specific actions in project work plan
design |
No linkages between actions and outputs with project objectives |
| |
System for data organisation and management present |
Data management system absent or inaccessible and inconsistent |
|
| |
|