|
|
Research |
Policy |
Outreach |
| |
|
Spatial–Temporal Scale |
Watersheds offer a meso-scale unit of analysis that reflects ecosystem
processes |
Watersheds as a new meso-scale setting for action to improve social and
environmental health determinants |
Watersheds as a scale that communities can relate to and that enable a
re-integration of social–ecological issues |
|
The Paradox of Promoting Health |
“Attribution” of specific health improvements to watershed
changes is challenging |
Success in health promotion can be considered a non-event and is harder to
measure than disease prevention |
Public may also struggle to identify / recognize health gains as a result of
watershed actions |
|
Ecological Goods and Services (EGAS) on a Watershed
Basis |
Potential to link the research agendas relating to EGAS, livelihoods, and
social determinants of health |
Valuing ecological goods and services within a watershed context may help
drive more integrated cross-sectoral approaches |
EGAS may be assisted with communication about health impacts of watersheds
|
|
Poverty and Watersheds |
Linking research agendas across health, ecosystems and society (especially
in relation to reducing inequities) |
Potential to link services and policies across health, sustainability, and
disaster reduction objectives. |
Initiatives to sustain ecosystems, livelihoods, and reduce quality could
have profound health benefits |
|
Governance Challenges |
Evaluating the role of watersheds as a place-based context in which to
govern for both health and sustainability |
Call for Health in all policies, pose new opportunities to link IWRM and
public health |
Communities could benefit from increased integration of services to achieve
multiple objectives |
|
“New Generation” Policy Instruments |
A focus on watersheds as a setting to link and integrate tools, including
impact assessments, indicators, risk, surveillance |
Policy leadership will be necessary to encourage proactive instruments and
integration between approaches at the watershed scale. |
Demand for accessible and community-relevant policy instruments may drive
policy innovation and integration at the watershed scale. |
|
Building Capacity For a Paradigm Shift |
Conceptualizing and managing complex adaptive social–ecological systems for
human health. |
Policy may need to drive and demand new approaches to training and
knowledge translation. Mechanisms for crossing jurisdictional barriers need to
be implemented. |
Watershed-based ecohealth case studies can support extension of the
approach to governmental actors and other stakeholders. Communities of practice
and funded training in ecohealth are required. |