Table 8. Results of the consensus analysis of the pile sort for “priorities for future water use in the Crocodile River not flowing?” (37 items).
| |
| |
|
Group |
Factors
and
eigenvalues |
Ratio between
factors |
Average competence
score |
Negative scorers? |
Conclusion |
| |
Whole group (irrigators and conservationists)
(N=43) |
1 = 5.473
2 = 3.539
3 = 1.965 |
1.55
1.80 |
-0.043
(± 0.354) |
Yes (8) |
No consensus |
Irrigators
(N=16) |
1 = 2.440 |
--- |
0.061
(± 0.386) |
Yes (3) |
No consensus |
Conservationists
(N=27) |
1 = 3.942
2 = 1.788
3 = 1.434 |
2.20
1.25 |
0.065
(± 0.377) |
Yes (5) |
No consensus |
|
| |
|