Table 1. Key questions addressed by consensus analysis, estimates produced by the consensus analysis module in Anthropac (Borgatti 1996a), and guiding diagnostic criteria used in our study.
| |
| |
|
Question |
Estimates |
Guiding diagnostic
criteria |
| |
|
1. To what extent does a group share a single cultural
model (i.e., shared mental model)? |
Eigenvalue factor ratios |
Consensus (single shared
mental model) |
- Ratio between the first and second
eigenvalue factors is ≥3.0 to 1.
|
|
|
|
No consensus |
If ratio between first and second factors is (Caulkins
2004):
- 2.0 to 2.9 to 1, then have weak
agreement.
- <2.0 to 1, then have
little/no agreement.
- Presence of two (or more) factors
of similar strength, then have two (or more) mental models (either
overlapping/nonopposing, or contested).
|
|
|
Average (group) competence score
|
- Scores normally range from 0 to
1.
- The higher the average competence
score, the higher the consensus.
- If <0.3, then assumptions of
cultural consensus model probably not met, i.e., no consensus (Romney et al.
1986).
|
|
2. To what extent does each respondent agree with the
group’s cultural beliefs (mental model)? |
Individual competence score |
- Scores normally range from 0 to
1.
- The higher the score, the more
knowledgeable and in agreement with the group is the person.
- A person with a negative score
indicates that s/he has a very different or unusual understanding of the
issue.
|
|
3. What are the “culturally appropriate
answers” to each item mentioned by the group? |
Answer key |
- Meaningful only if the data show
consensus.
- Tells you the culturally
agreed upon or “correct” answers, i.e., what the group agreed on were
the components of the domain (or mental model).
|
|
| |
|