Table 2. Summary results of the consensus analysis for each sample and subsample. Data are the eigenratios. A value > 3 indicates that there is consensus between elements of the mental model assuming no negative competence scores. Where the latter existed, the evidence did not support a consensus model. For the "system" analysis, all stakeholder, resources, and processes were included but the interactions data were excluded. WB, Water Board.

Theme WB Non–WB Core WB WB + non–WB New WB New WB + non–WB
(n = 23) (n = 17) (n = 12) (n = 40) (n = 11) (n = 28)
Stakeholders 4.53† 6.82‡ 4.70‡ 4.48† 2.27† 4.55†
Resources 2.99§ 1.51† 2.28§ 2.19† 2.27† 2.29†
Processes 3.69‡ 0.77† 3.64‡ 4.65† 2.57† 2.79†
Interactions 1.08† 1.05† 1.08† 1.08† 1.07† 1.06†
System 5.87‡ 5.87‡ 6.54‡ 6.08‡ 3.90‡ 5.21‡

† Consensus model assumptions violated.
‡ Consensus.
§ Weak agreement.