Table 2. Summary results of the consensus analysis for each sample and subsample. Data are the eigenratios. A value > 3 indicates that there is consensus between elements of the mental model assuming no negative competence scores. Where the latter existed, the evidence did not support a consensus model. For the "system" analysis, all stakeholder, resources, and processes were included but the interactions data were excluded. WB, Water Board.
| |
| |
|
Theme |
WB |
Non–WB |
Core WB |
WB + non–WB |
New WB |
New WB + non–WB |
|
(n = 23) |
(n = 17) |
(n = 12) |
(n = 40) |
(n = 11) |
(n = 28) |
| |
|
Stakeholders |
4.53† |
6.82‡ |
4.70‡ |
4.48† |
2.27† |
4.55† |
|
Resources |
2.99§ |
1.51† |
2.28§ |
2.19† |
2.27† |
2.29† |
|
Processes |
3.69‡ |
0.77† |
3.64‡ |
4.65† |
2.57† |
2.79† |
|
Interactions |
1.08† |
1.05† |
1.08† |
1.08† |
1.07† |
1.06† |
|
System |
5.87‡ |
5.87‡ |
6.54‡ |
6.08‡ |
3.90‡ |
5.21‡ |
|
| |
† Consensus model assumptions violated.
‡ Consensus.
§ Weak agreement.