Table 3. Evidence summary for hypotheses.
| |
| |
|
|
Hypothesis |
Support |
| |
|
H1: |
Decreases in precipitation will drive increased rates of land
aggregation |
Strong, given real constraints on smaller properties |
|
H2: |
Environmental licensing will lead to better environmental outcomes on
properties currently lacking significant forest cover |
Strong, if licensing implemented effectively; weak, otherwise |
|
H3: |
Reduced access to markets through environmental licensing will drive
increased rates of land aggregation |
Strong, if licensing implemented effectively, given real constraints on
smaller properties |
|
H4: |
Reduced licensing requirements for small properties will lead to lower
rates of land aggregation |
Weak to fair, depending on how licensing is implemented |
|
| |
|