Table 4. Individual and institutional adaptive strategies and policies proposed by stakeholders, their scale, and dimension of intervention.
| |
| |
|
Adaptive strategy |
Scale |
Dimension |
| |
Harmonize institutional planning responses, integrate
participatory decision making processes:
• decentralization, without
deregulation, that creates, strengthens, and delegates power and economic
responsibility to local organizations and institutions
• private–public
partnerships
|
national–regional–local |
institutional |
Revise international trade policies to improve market access:
• take advantage of existing
mechanisms for “local products” and special “safeguard
mechanisms” to protect national agricultural sectors
• establish appropriate food stocks to
prevent price volatility
• secure access to information and
microcredit
|
national–international |
political |
Mechanisms and funding to support rural investments:
• establish appropriate
policies to reduce impacts of food-price inflation
• invest in agriculture in
low-potential areas as a social investment
• diversify rural on-farm and
off-farm economies
• financial compensation for ecosystem-services
protection
• infrastructure investments
|
national–international |
political |
Strengthen law enforcement for land ownership and rights to natural resources access:
• secure land rights
• ensure land access for disadvantaged
groups
• restrict land sales to foreign investors
|
national |
political |
Reinforce organizations and networks (governance and adaptive
comanagement):
• capacity building for communities to achieve self-sustaining
projects
• strengthen alliances and coordination between comanagers (FORO
Miraflor), communities, landowners, ranchers, trade unions, councils, and
academic institutions
• enhance market competitiveness, e.g., construct warehouses for crop and
dairy products
|
local–regional |
social–institutional |
Farmer-to-farmer knowledge exchange and extension:
• share good farming
practices through the establishment of model farms, and strengthen capacity to
monitor and assess
• exchange native crop varieties through local seed
fairs
• join national networks, e.g., Farmer-to-Farmer Program; initiatives
such as “Seeds for Identity”
• farm-planning design with ten-year timespan
|
local–regional–national |
social–institutional |
Innovative agricultural practices:
• switch from monoculture to
diversified agriculture: use traditional maize–bean intercropping system,
cultivar rotation with green manure or farm-cattle manure
• technological
innovation (low energy input) to produce quality dairy products
•
equilibrate nutrient flows through integrated management with mixed-farming
systems, crop–pasture nutrient management
• improve livestock systems with
rotational grazing systems, fodder bank for livestock, fodder tree in
paddocks
• support on-farm experiments with rotational livestock and protein
banks
|
local |
environmental–productive |
Dry forest conservation programs:
• reforestation with local species for
vulnerable and exposed areas
• planned natural regeneration
• development of management guidelines
|
local |
environmental |
Water-system technologies:
• small-scale water management solutions,
i.e., rainwater harvesting techniques, tanks
• water retention in soil, through innovative agricultural practices
|
local–regional |
social–institutional–environmental |
Alternative energy sources:
• create communal “energy forest” to
supply fuel wood without threatening remaining dry forest
• develop
wind power
|
local–regional–national |
social–institutional–environmental |
Communication plans:
• transfer technical and scientific knowledge to
local stakeholders
• coordinate early warning systems and disaster risk
programs
• coordinate between comanagers and councils to enhance their
prevalence in the area (strengthen the efficacy of local rules)
|
local |
social–institutional |
Investigate feasibility of ecotourism:
• create and train a
tourism commission |
local–national |
social–economic |
|
| |
|