|
Components |
I. Business as usual |
II. Community-based
protectionism |
III. Development and conservation |
IV. Progress and technology |
| |
|
National conjuncture |
Global and national instability |
Political and socioeconomic stability |
Social and political stability |
Political stability and socioeconomic instability
|
|
Market dynamics and international treaties |
Volatile markets without state control |
Protectionism
Economic treaties within alternative commercial alliances
in Latin America
|
New international partnerships and trade agreements with EU, USA,
Latin American countries |
Free trade agreement with EU and USA |
|
Macroeconomic and sectoral policies |
Structural Adjustment Programs
Absent sectoral policies for rural areas
|
Subsidized social programs and restrictive environmental plans,
organic agriculture programs |
Service-sector development (e.g., tourism), sustainable organic agriculture
programs, environmental policies
|
Free competition and economic deregulation |
|
External agents |
Role of state limited to poverty alleviation programs and food
relief |
International funding supports conservation programs and active
research institutes
|
International funds promote rural initiatives, e.g. microcredit, and
active research institutes
|
Foreign entrepreneurial investment |
|
Development initiatives/income sources |
Agriculture retracts due to global prices/markets for rural commodities
Wealth stratification |
Community /cooperative agropastoral initiatives
Few entrepreneurs and little
investment |
Job diversification
Product diversification
Ecotourism promoted
by entrepreneurs
Payment for ecosystem services
|
Agroindustrial development
Economic growth for commercial ranchers and
wealth stratification |
|
Local governance |
Local corruption, lack of transparency, weak trade unions
|
Reinforced local organizations Effective environmental protection,
control, and monitoring |
Reinforced trade unions and partnerships
Upgraded systems for
monitoring and controlling environmental protection
|
Strong trade unions among commercial ranchers Weak local monitoring and
control of environment |
|
Distribution of/access to land, natural resources, and capital
|
Progressive land
abandonment
Proletarization,
marginalization
Limited access to land and natural
resources |
Land redistribution/regulation (prevalence of small farming systems and
household economies)
National top-down control for guaranteeing access to/use of
natural resources |
Land regulation, presence of different typologies of commercial and
household economies
New local arrangements and rules for guaranteeing
equal access and use of natural resources
|
Land concentration (deregulated and liberalized land markets)
Unequal
access to natural resources
|
|
Land use and management |
Monofunctional land use (pastoral use) and intensification
Agropastoral and dry forest degradation |
Monofunctional land use (agropastoral use)
Expansion of subsistence
cultivation systems (traditional and agroecological low external inputs
agriculture) and reforestation/ regeneration practices
|
Multifunctional land-use innovations in agropastoral systems management
with agroecological semi-intensification (low external inputs agriculture and
forest regeneration/ conservation practices)
|
Monofunctional land use (pastoral use)
High external inputs agriculture
(intensification)
Dismantled subsistence systems |
|
Labor market |
Economic stratification and labor exploitation persist, high out-migration
|
Few or moderate opportunities in rural areas |
New job opportunities in a wide range of agricultural and service
sectors |
Only agrarian workers
Few alternative opportunities in mechanized rural
economies
|
|
Social cohesion |
Low community spirit /workers’ moral
Social and political conflicts over land and natural
resources
|
Strong community-based protectionism among landless people |
Collaboration and partnerships among local users and trade unions
|
Competitiveness and individualism deconstruct social ties |
|
Culture, values, lifestyle |
Persistent corruption
Resistance to change among local traditional large
landowners
Youth preference for urban lifestyle
|
Historical coping strategies
Strong sense of belonging |
New rural lifestyle
New sense of belonging (e.g., brand and green
culture) |
Weak sense of belonging
Urban lifestyle attracts people in rural areas
|
|
Infrastructure and technology |
Absence of investment |
Investments in agricultural extension programs |
Investment in green management practices (low-input technology) |
High levels of private investment in technology and infrastructure |