|
|
Multiscale drivers of change |
Local perception about historical vulnerability trends
|
|
|
|
|
Historical period |
Socioeconomic and political structure
|
Local land tenure, land use, and natural resource
management |
Ecological resilience |
Individual socioeconomic ability |
Institutional capacity |
| |
| |
Circa 1900–1936: Post-independence period |
New agrarian rules
Export-oriented coffee boom (sector of income and job
provider)
Polycentric natural resource management (NRM)
|
Latifundia and patronage system coexist with
communitarian system and medium-sized households
• Traditional slash and burn
• Fire management for weed and bush control
• Mixed browsing/grazers
• Transhumance |
• High landscape connectedness
• Pastures resilient after shock
• Agro- biodiversity conservation
• Good soil quality |
• Productive diversification (coffee and livestock)
• Land/assets access for household economy
• Socio- economic exchanges between ecological zones
• Commercial economy growth
• Persistent coping mechanisms |
• Strong sense of belonging
• Strong social capital
• Weak centralized institutional systems
|
| |
1936–1979: Dictatorial regime |
1950–1970: “Capitalist modernization”
• Absence of poverty-alleviation programs
• Coffee crisis
• Export-oriented “livestock boom”
production
• Commodity food import
• Technological
boom Political and economic decline
started by 1970s
• Migration of landowners
• Dictatorial command-and-control
system
|
Land concentration (“Latifundia” administered by few
families
• Introduction of agrochemicals and
high-energy and water-intensive crops • Changes in
management of livestock–pasture (e.g., fencing) |
• Decreasing native grasses cover due to intensification
• Initial dry forest deforestation
• Progressive soil impoverishment and substitution of crop
varieties
|
• Increasing patronage dependence and household
indebtedness
• Increase in wealth-distribution and land-access inequality
• Limited technology and credit access for household economy
|
• Absence of safety-net programs
• High levels of conflict and confrontation over land, high levels of social and
political uncertainty
|
| |
1979–1990: Socialist period and the contra-revolutionary war
|
1980–1984: Socialist state reforms (e.g.,
nationalization policy, price and food-security programs, agrarian reform)
• Subsidized economy, export oriented
x• Implementation of “Green Revolution” programs
Socialist command-and-control system
1985-1989: Contra-revolutionary
conflict and socioeconomic crisis (e.g. high inflation rate) |
1980–1984: Land
redistribution (specialized productive cooperative system)
• Intensified export-oriented agropastoral dairy production
and food-oriented high-energy farming systems
• Loss of transhumance
system 1985–1989: Productive military
cooperatives
• Decrease in cattle population and exports
• Land abandonment |
• Increasing dry forest degradation and fragmentation
• Transition of native mature grasses to bush and woody cover
|
• Land and NR access for household economy
• Diffusion of credit and information access for households
• Human capital reinforcement
• Disrupted value-added system production
• Disrupted individual and social networks during the
war |
• Strong safety-net programs implemented
• Open social conflicts on land and NRM; disrupted social
ties and networks during the war |
| |
1990–2006: Economic liberalization |
Peace accords and democratic elections
• Neoliberal state reforms (e.g., structural adjustment and
poverty-alleviation programs)
• Organizational crisis
• Absence of investment, stagnating economic situation, and
uncertainty over International Free Commercial Treaties
• Administrative deconcentration process
• National Development Plan prioritizes agroexports and import
of food commodities
• Absence of food-security programs
Contract manufacturing diffusion in
urban areas
International conservation funds encouraged new
environmental priorities and regulations |
Land reallocation schemes (privatized system)
• Minifundia system diffusion
• New rules and mechanisms of management (e.g., comanagement
agreement) within protected areas
• Demographic change: Population growth, returns, and refugee resettlement
schemes; youth out-migration |
• Increasing dry forest patches, fragmentation in some private
land areas, and slow recovery of tree density and natural regeneration in other
land areas
• Diffusion of A. pennatula
• Landscape fragmentation |
• Loss of the financial and material assets (e.g., land) for
household economy and pauperization process
• Loss in human capital (access to schools, health systems,
etc.)
• Progressive increase in wealth distribution
inequity
• Decrease in investment capacities of commercial economies
|
• Weak governmental social programs (e.g., for food security)
• Increasing dependence on external aid
• Latent social confrontation and conflict over the control of
protected-area management |