Table 1. Comparative co-engineering process characteristics.
| |
| |
|
Characteristic |
Australian process |
Bulgarian process |
| |
Process type
|
Management-driven, supported by research
|
Research-driven to support management
|
Principle shared objective
|
Create a regional estuary management plan
|
Test a multi-level participatory modeling process for joint flood and
drought risk management
|
Principle co-engineering institutions
|
Local government water managers; university researchers; private
environmental engineering consultants
|
University researchers; government institute researchers; private research
consultants; stakeholder group
|
Participatory process stakeholder and administrative level
inclusion
|
State government departmental representatives; local government councilors;
managers, planners, and scientists; national environmental NGO; Catchment
Management Authority representative; regional associations, industries and
commerce; regional water-agency managers; local residents
|
National Ministers and departmental representatives; national NGOs,
association representatives and water experts; Water Basin Directorate
representatives; regional mayors; regional water-agency manager; municipal
representatives; local residents
|
Participatory process (and average number of participants at each
workshop)
|
Three workshops over 4 months with 38 participants (average of 22 per
workshop)
|
Two sets of interviews and 15 workshops over 1 yr with approximately 135
participants (first 13 workshops: average 8; last two workshops: average
26) |
|
| |
|