|
Questions and alternatives |
Number of answers† |
Ranking |
| |
| (A2) Which are the
most important application fields you believe need to be supported?
Please clarify. |
| |
• other: communication and conflict negotiation in participatory
processes
|
15 |
1 |
• landscape management planning (intersectoral)
|
11 |
2 |
• policy support/consulting
|
11 |
• impact assessment/estimation of potentials and risks in
planning
|
7 |
3 |
• operational management and decision support
(intrasectoral)
|
3 |
4 |
• other: further education and training
|
3 |
| |
|
(B2) On which features should the development focus? |
|
| |
|
output type |
• qualitative results (visualized results, e.g., maps, diagrams, trends
for different planning alternatives)
|
21 |
1 |
• quantitative results (data (sets) or indicator sets as output to
evaluate planning alternatives)
|
14 |
2 |
| |
|
user insight into results generation |
• free design of decision and management planning alternatives, user
can generate rules and criteria and modify the evaluation basis
|
18 |
1 |
• modeling based results/simulation of landscape development, user
input restricted to environmental data
|
12 |
2 |
• multicriteria decision
making (MCDM), user input: decision criteria and data, optional
choice between different MCDM methods
|
4 |
3 |
| |
|
style of user guidance to decisions |
• visualization of the relative benefit
of different alternatives by using maps and information on
positive/negative trends
|
17 |
1 |
• Geographic Information
Systems-oriented tool, which allows user to visualize planning
alternatives and integrate multiple environmental information
in decisions but is not too complex in handling and focuses
on evaluation of scenarios
|
16 |
2 |
• comparison of different planning alternatives by (selected)
indices
|
11 |
3 |
• proposition of the “best” alternative (decision
making)
|
7 |
4 |
• decision tree
|
5 |
5 |