Table 1. The model network ITE²M with its indicators, spatial reference units, and model output considered in this study.
All models, with the exception of SWAT (Arnold et al. 1998), were developed in the research groups contributing to this study.
| |
| |
|
Acronym |
Name |
Selected publications |
Indicators considered in this study |
Spatial reference unit |
Model output |
| |
|
ATOMIS |
Assessment Tool for Metals in Soils |
Breuer et al. 2007, Reiher 2008 |
Cu, Zn, and Cd input loads and topsoil
concentrations |
20 × 20 m |
Means per ha |
|
SWAT |
Soil and Water Assessment Tool |
Fohrer et al. 2005, Breuer et al.
2007 |
Nitrate-N loads, discharge,
evapotranspiration |
100 × 100 m |
Means per ha and year |
|
ProF |
Prognosis of Floristics |
Waldhardt et al. 2004, Sheridan and Waldhardt
2006 |
Plant species richness, richness in insect-pollinated
species, and low-nutrient indicators |
500 × 500 m |
Means per 25 ha |
|
GEPARD |
Geographically Explicit Prediction of Animal Richness
Distributions |
Gottschalk et al. 2007, 2009, 2010 |
Breeding populations of nine indicator bird
species |
10 × 10 m |
Means per 100 m² |
|
ProLand |
Prognosis of Land Use |
Möller 1998, Möller et al. 2002, Weinmann
2002, Weinmann et al. 2006, Sheridan and Waldhardt 2006, Sheridan et al.
2007 |
Land rent, transfer payments, recommendation on
N-fertilization |
Land parcel |
Means per ha and year |
|
CHOICE |
Choice Valuation of Non-Commodities |
Schmitz et al. 2003, Borresch et al. 2005, Schmitz
2008 |
Willingness to pay for landscape
scenery |
Landscape |
Willingness to pay per household and
year |
|
| |
|