Table 4. Criteria used to evaluate BNs as a participatory tool, based on the references cited.
| |
| |
| Criteria |
Definition of evaluation criteria |
Refs. † |
| |
| Capabilities of
BNs |
| 8. Structure the participatory
process |
Constructing and using BNs structured
the process by clarifying policy objectives and system boundaries,
and by providing mechanisms for structuring and displaying
the decision making procedure |
1,2,3,4,5 |
| |
|
|
| 9. Identify the level of knowledge
or uncertainty |
Constructing and using BNs helped
to identify the areas where there is a lack or a deficiency
in information |
|
| |
|
|
| 10.Encourage communication
and discussions |
Constructing and using BNs encouraged
stakeholders to exchange information and views |
|
| |
|
|
| 11. Graphical interface |
The graphical visualization of
BNs contributed to a better understanding of the system |
6 |
| |
| Use of BNs |
| 12. Specific skills |
Constructing and using BNs required
specific skills from the user |
3 |
| |
|
|
| 13. Resources |
Constructing and using BNs required
significant time from stakeholders |
3, 5 |
| |
| Products of BNs |
| 14. Useful format of the results |
Using BNs produced outputs in
a format (probability distributions) that is useful for stakeholders |
6 |
|
| |
† 1 - Webler et al. 1995; 2 - Rowe and Frewer 2000; 3 - Rowe and Frewer 2004; 4 - Burguess and Chilvers 2006; 5 - Von Korff 2006;
6 - Lynam et al. 2007.
|