Table 2. Political trade-offs across institutional actors affected by changes to Israel’s integrated water resources management system.
|
|
| Institutional actor |
Political cost incurred |
Political benefits received |
|
| Ministry of Agriculture |
Loss of ability to influence water pricing |
Side agreement on water pricing Input into nomination of public representative on oversight committee Representation on oversight committee Responsibilities for drainage issues unchanged
|
|
| Ministry of Interior |
Loss of authority over water pricing and wastewater |
Input into nomination of public representative on oversight committee
Gradual transfer of responsibilities
Representation on oversight committee
|
|
| Ministry of Infrastructure |
Loss of ministerial control over the new Water Authority |
Nomination of head of Water Authority
Input into nomination of public representative on oversight committee
Representation on oversight committee
|
|
| Ministry of Environment |
Loss of partial control over water pollution |
Responsibilities for water quality protection unchanged
Representation on oversight committee |
|
| Ministry of Finance |
Conceded use of market-driven water pricing Conceded direct effect on water pricing |
Ability to set annual water budget |
|
| |
|