|
Factors |
Indicators |
Indicator types |
Remarks |
| |
|
Forest tenure |
Resource access |
Category |
1- Open access, 2- Collective access, 3- Individual/Private
access |
|
Boundary conflicts |
Category |
1. intro–inter village boundaries are clear; 2. inter-village boundaries
are clear, whereas intro-village boundaries are not; 3.Both boundaries are
vague |
|
Institution and management |
Existence of regulations |
Binary |
0, no; 1 yes |
|
Existence of monitoring committee |
Binary |
0, no; 1 yes |
|
Implementation status |
Category |
1- Restricted monitoring and implementation, 2- Moderate monitoring and
implementation, 3- Poor/no monitoring and implementation |
|
Equity in resource accessibility |
Category |
1- Equal opportunities for everyone, 2- Equal opportunities for most of the
population, 3- Exclusive opportunities for designated population |
|
Resource-use pattern |
Category |
1- Individual competition, 2- Cooperative harvesting, 3- Contracted
harvesting |
|
Benefit sharing |
Binary |
0- No benefit-sharing mechanism, 1- Benefit-sharing mechanism |
Natural setting |
Complexity of terrain |
Category |
1- Low spatial variation in terrain, 2- Moderate spatial variation in
terrain, 3- High spatial variation in terrain |
|
Percentage of forest cover |
Ratio/Numeric |
Data estimated by local village head and visually verified through
satellite imagery |
|
Matsutake production |
Matsutake habitat area (rectified) |
Numeric |
If several villages shared the same harvesting area, the habitat area was
rectified by dividing the total harvesting area by the no. of villages |
|
Matsutake habitat area/person |
Numeric |
|
|
Total production of Matsutake (rectified) |
Numeric |
Similar to indicator 11, total production was estimated at the market, the
production of the village investigated was rectified by dividing the total
production estimated at the market by the no. of villages |
|
Matsutake production/habitat area |
Numeric |
|
|
Harvesting production/capita |
Numeric |
|
|
Livelihoods |
Contribution of matsutake to cash income |
Numeric |
Percentage of household income |
|
Average cash income per capita |
Numeric |
|
|
Average agricultural landholding per capita |
Numeric |
|
Labor input |
Length of matustake harvesting season |
Numeric |
Total harvesting days |
|
Average travel time per harvesting trip |
Numeric |
Hours |
|
Income |
Average cash income per year per capita from matsutake |
Numeric |
Yuan |
|
Market |
Nearest market category |
Category |
1- County market, 2- Village market, 3- Floating market |
|
Degree to which information on pricing is accessible |
Category |
1- Well known (through mobile, transparent market), 2- Moderately known, 3-
Poorly known |
|
Choice of and chance for selling |
Category |
1- Good (with more than five competitive buyers); 2- Moderate (with three to five
buyers), 3- Poor (one or two buyers) |
|
Harvesting behavior |
No harvesting of <4–5 cm |
Category |
1- Restrictions implemented, 2- Moderately implemented, 3- Poorly
implemented, |
|
Habitat management |
Category |
1- Good management (with site preparation, e.g., thinning, watering,), 2-
Moderate management, 3- Poor management |