Table 1. Inherent and potential contributions of different design elements to different ecosystem services in intensively managed landscapes. Landscape Features Ecosystem Services Total Provisioning Regulating Cultural Performance I* P** I P I P I P Patches of native vegetation n*** $$ $$ $$$ $ $$ $$$ $$$$$$$ Vegetative buffers n $$ $$$ $$$ n $$ $$$ $$$$$$$ Natural or constructed wetlands n $$ $$$ $$$ $ $$$ $$$$ $$$$$$$$ Edible gardens $$$ $$$ $ $$ $ $$$ $$$$$ $$$$$$$$ Stormwater infiltration systems n $$ $$$ $$$ n $$ $$$ $$$$$$$ Waste treatment systems n $$ $$ $$$ $ $$ $$$ $$$$$$$ These relative contributions are presented from a conceptual perspective, but they could be replaced with direct and indirect monetary values where data are available for a given region. *I = the relative inherent value typically provided by these landscape features for each category of ecosystem service **P = the relative potential value these landscape features could provide if designed using the landscape multifunctionality approach ***Relative values are indicated by: n = none; $ = low; $$ = medium, and $$$ = high