Table 3. Community perceptions of logging impacts expressed at PRA workshops. (CCP logged = already participating in full-scale logging; Beginning CCP logging = some sales from agricultural clearings, signed contracts; non-CCP = have yet to sign contracts; X - Community members disagreed as to whether or not there had been hunting declines)
| |
| |
| Impacts |
Colonist Community |
| |
CCP logged |
Beginning CCP |
Non-CCP |
| |
|
|
Anta |
Santo Antonio |
Piranha |
São Mateus |
São João |
| |
| Positive |
|
|
|
|
|
| Roads |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
| Income |
● |
● |
● |
● |
● |
| Loans/advances |
● |
● |
|
● |
● |
| Community infrastructure |
● |
● |
|
|
● |
| Transportation (rides) |
● |
● |
|
|
|
| Land demarcation |
● |
|
|
|
● |
| Prevention of illegal logging |
|
|
● |
|
● |
| Trails |
|
|
|
|
● |
| Employment |
|
● |
|
|
|
| Knowledge of forest |
|
● |
|
|
|
| Negative |
|
|
|
|
|
| Hunting decline |
● |
X |
|
● |
● |
| Low price |
● |
|
● |
|
|
| Loss of freedom |
|
|
● |
|
● |
| Fruit decline |
|
● |
|
|
|
| Failure to meet promises |
|
|
|
● |
|
| No timber in future |
|
|
|
|
● |
| Pollution of streams |
● |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|