Table 1. Terror management theory predictions for how thinking about mortality in association with climate change (GCC) affects people's behavior. GCC primes include a range of stimuli that cause people to think about the impacts of and risks associated with global climate change.
| |
| |
| Hypothesis |
Predictions |
| |
| GCC primes increase death thought accessibility. |
Death thought accessibility will increase when people are asked to think about global climate change. High-severity forecasts will increase death thought accessibility more than low-severity forecasts. |
People will exhibit proximal defenses in
response to information about GCC by:
|
|
| Denying that the threat exists; |
GCC prime increases both the frequency and intensity of climate change denial. |
| Accepting GCC, but denying that humans are the cause; |
GCC prime increases the intensity of denial that humans cause climate change. |
|
| Accepting GCC, but pushing the timing far into the future. |
GCC prime increases estimates of the amount of time until the occurrence of severe climate-change effects or the tipping point. |
|
People will exhibit distal defenses in response to information about GCC by:
|
|
| Striving for self-esteem; |
GCC prime increases striving for self-esteem within the context of the individual’s world view. |
| Defending their world views; |
GCC prime increases the intensity and frequency of the world view defense, e.g., making donations to a political party, espousing a world view, defending a world view. |
| Showing antagonism toward outgroups; |
GCC prime increases the devaluation and marginalization of and aggression and violence against individuals and groups with opposing world views. |
| Transference idealization. |
GCC prime increases the valuation of leaders with a shared world view and the propensity to grant power to world view leaders. |
|
| |
|