Table 1. Summary of fishers’ network characteristics.
| |
| |
|
Characteristic |
Community Network (all relations combined) |
|
Low Resource Scarcity |
|
High Resource Scarcity |
|
| |
AV |
SN |
RM |
|
CZ |
JC |
LG |
EB |
| |
|
Network data |
|
|
Number of fishers |
18 |
11 |
5 |
|
36 |
6 |
20 |
20 |
|
| Number of components |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
1 |
1 |
1 |
1 |
|
Largest component |
|
|
Number of fishers |
18 |
11 |
5 |
|
36 |
6 |
20 |
20 |
|
|
Isolated fishers† |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
4 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
|
Indicators of network cohesiveness |
|
|
Largest k-core |
6 |
3 |
3 |
|
7 |
2 |
8 |
8 |
|
|
No. of fishers in largest k-core |
13 |
6 |
5 |
|
12 |
5 |
13 |
15 |
|
|
Proportion in 2-core and higher |
1.00 |
0.83 |
1.00 |
|
0.72 |
0.83 |
1.0 |
1.0 |
|
Indicators of structural holes |
|
|
No. of cut-points |
0 |
1 |
0 |
|
5 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
|
|
No. of blocks |
1 |
2 |
1 |
|
8 |
2 |
1 |
1 |
|
|
Proportion of cut-points to total points |
0 |
0.08 |
0.00 |
|
0.13 |
0.20 |
0.00 |
0 |
| Estimated network configuration |
|
| |
Complete |
Coalitional |
Complete |
|
Coalitional |
Coalitional |
Complete |
Complete |
|
| |
† Isolated fishers within communities reported not to consult
fishers within their communities. To determine the bonding and bridging
characteristics of each community, isolated fishers were not
considered.
|