Table 1. The approach adopted in this study
| |
| |
| |
Awareness raising phase
|
Project simulation phase
|
|
|
|
| |
Technical workshop |
Practical workshop |
Role-playing game |
Individual farm projects |
Co-design workshop |
| |
| Main questions |
What is drip irrigation about? |
How does it work? |
Why a joint project? |
What are the farming projects? |
What are the collective choices of the project? |
| |
| Means |
Video projected presentation and group discussion |
Farmers visit other farmers who use drip irrigation |
Role-play scenario: design of a virtual joint project |
Survey made by the farmers themselves |
Simulation of farmers' project |
| |
| Outputs |
Farmers formalize and share their problems and link them with drip irrigation |
Farmers build a consensus on the usefulness of the project |
Farmers understand that a joint project has to fit to individual needs |
Farmers define their farming project |
Farmers make collective choices for the terms of reference of a feasibility study |
| |
| Outcomes |
Farmers gain knowledge on the drip irrigation technique |
Farmers gain knowledge on drip irrigation projects, create knowledge network |
Farmers gain knowledge on the pros and cons of joint projects |
Farmers commit themselves to the execution of the project and envisage the future |
Farmers take over the process |
|
| |
|