Appendix 1. Results of process evaluation using the indicators of Rowe and
Frewer (2000): 1 = strongly agree, 2 = agree, 3 = neither agree nor disagree,
4 = disagree, 5 = strongly disagree, 0 = not applicable.
| |
| |
|
farmer
|
represent-ativeness
|
independence
|
early involvement
|
influence
|
transparency
|
resource accessibility
|
task definition
|
structured decision making
|
cost effectiveness
|
Average score per group
|
| |
|
Agrarian reform
cooperative
|
A
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
2.6
|
|
B
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
|
C
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
|
D
|
1
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
|
Average score
|
|
2.0
|
3.0
|
2.8
|
3.0
|
2.3
|
3.0
|
2.3
|
2.3
|
2.8
|
|
Farming equipment
cooperative
|
E
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
2.6
|
|
F
|
1
|
4
|
4
|
3
|
2
|
4
|
3
|
1
|
4
|
|
G
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
1
|
|
Average score
|
|
1.7
|
4.0
|
3.0
|
3.0
|
2.0
|
3.3
|
2.7
|
1.0
|
3.0
|
|
Milk cooperative
|
H
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
2.4
|
|
I
|
2
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
2
|
2
|
0
|
|
J
|
1
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
3
|
5
|
2
|
0
|
|
K
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
5
|
5
|
2
|
2
|
|
L
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
5
|
5
|
2
|
2
|
|
Average score
|
|
1.4
|
1.8
|
2.2
|
2.4
|
2.4
|
3.8
|
3.8
|
2.0
|
1.4
|
|
Family Group
|
M
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
1
|
3
|
2.0
|
|
N
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
2
|
|
Average score
|
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
2.0
|
1.5
|
2.5
|
| |
|